Installation RBS Change : problème option -t exim4
-
15/10/2011 10:45
Bonjour à tous,
j'ai un nouveau problème lié à mon installation, il concerne le non envoi des mails :
mon Mailer-Daemon me renvoi un msg d'erreur voir ci-après.
Merci de votre aide
Cordialement
erreur renvoyée par exim
1- entete
******************************************************************************
Return-Path: <>
Received: from mwinf5c56 (mwinf5c56.me-wanadoo.net [10.223.111.106])
by mwinb2103 with LMTPA;
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:43:41 +0200
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
Received: from mailfront2.oxyd.net ([87.252.2.79])
by mwinf5c56 with ME
id ktjh1h00D1iH12F01tjhLz; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:43:41 +0200
X-bcc: f.lyonne@wanadoo.fr
X-me-spamrating: 0.00
X-me-spamcause: (10001)(0000)gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeefvddruddvgddtudcuteggodetufcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfogfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecugedttdenucfpohhtihhfihgtrghtihhonhculddutddttddumdenucfjughrpefhvffusedttddttddttddtnecuhfhrohhmpeforghilhcuffgvlhhivhgvrhihucfuhihsthgvmhcuoeforghilhgvrhdqffgrvghmohhnsehophgrlhihshdqfhhlvghurhhsrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhepfiiffidrohhprghlhihsqdhflhgvuhdpihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgsrhdpohhprghlhihsqdhflhgvuhhrshdrtghomhdprhhsrdgtohhmne
X-ME-engine: default
Received: from localhost (mailfront2.oxyd.net [127.0.0.1])
by mailfront2.oxyd.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F830EC42E3
for <info-compte@opalys-fleurs.com>; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:43:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=6.31 tests=[none]
Received: from mailfront2.oxyd.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mailfront2.oxyd.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id VudJOBTN4RXp for <info-compte@opalys-fleurs.com>;
Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:43:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp04.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.126])
by mailfront2.oxyd.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2B8EC42AB
for <info-compte@opalys-fleurs.com>; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:43:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from www.opalys-fleurs.com ([82.127.66.230])
by mwinf5d07 with ME
id ktjd1h0034y4oEA03tjdoL; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:43:37 +0200
X-ME-engine: defaultReceived: from Debian-exim by www.opalys-fleurs.com with local (Exim 4.72)
id 1REx5n-0004Ki-HR
for info-compte@opalys-fleurs.com; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:47:31 +0200
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:47:31 +0200
Message-Id: <E1REx5n-0004Ki-HR@www.opalys-fleurs.com>
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@opalys-fleurs.com>
To: info-compte@opalys-fleurs.com
Subject: Mail failure - no recipient addresses
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From:
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on www.opalys-fleurs.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
1- corps
******************************************************************************
A message that you sent using the -t command line option contained no addresses that were not also on the command line, and were therefore suppressed. This left no recipient addresses, and so no delivery could be attempted.
------ This is a copy of your message, including all the headers. ------
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 07:47:31 +0200
Message-Id: <E1REx5n-0004Kh-H9@www.opalys-fleurs.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_729ae76d82d3e75127f3d47fc80d14db"
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: info-compte@opalys-fleurs.com
To: f.lyonne@wanadoo.fr
Subject: Informations utilisateurs
--=_729ae76d82d3e75127f3d47fc80d14db
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cher(chère) ,vous recevez cet e-mail suite à votre inscription sur note site Internet.
Nom de connexion : flyonne
Mot de passe : C6JG7S9iT5
Pour activer votre compte, veuillez suivre l'URL : https://www.opalys-f.....email/11569/giuGaufu
Cordialement, votre administrateur Change --=_729ae76d82d3e75127f3d47fc80d14db
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <html> <head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"/>
<title>Informations utilisateurs</title>
</head>
<body>
<em>Cher(ch=C3=A8re) ,</em> <p>vous recevez cet e-mail suite =C3=A0 votre=
inscription sur note site Internet.<br/> Nom de connexion : flyonne<br/> Mot de passe : C6JG7S9iT5<br/> Pour activer votre compte, veuillez suivre l'URL : https://www.opalys-fleu= rs.com/fr/confirm-email/11569/giuGaufu<br/>
</p>
<em>Cordialement, votre administrateur Change</em></body> </html>
--=_729ae76d82d3e75127f3d47fc80d14db--
******************************************************************************
ci-dessous extrait du man d'exim4 v 4.72.6 sous debian squeeze 6.0.2
******************************************************************************
-t When Exim is receiving a locally-generated, non-SMTP message
on its standard input, the -t option causes the recipients of
the message to be obtained from the To:, Cc:, and Bcc: header
lines in the message instead of from the command arguments.
The addresses are extracted before any rewriting takes place
and the Bcc: header line, if present, is then removed.
If the command has any arguments, they specify addresses to
which the message is not to be delivered. That is, the argu‐
ment addresses are removed from the recipients list obtained
from the headers. This is compatible with Smail 3 and in
accordance with the documented behaviour of several versions
of Sendmail, as described in man pages on a number of operat‐
ing systems (e.g. Solaris 8, IRIX 6.5, HP-UX 11). However,
some versions of Sendmail add argument addresses to those
obtained from the headers, and the O'Reilly Sendmail book
documents it that way. Exim can be made to add argument
addresses instead of subtracting them by setting the option
extract_addresses_remove_arguments false.
If there are any Resent- header lines in the message, Exim
extracts recipients from all Resent-To:, Resent-Cc:, and
Resent-Bcc: header lines instead of from To:, Cc:, and Bcc:.
This is for compatibility with Sendmail and other MTAs.
(Prior to release 4.20, Exim gave an error if -t was used in
conjunction with Resent- header lines.)
RFC 2822 talks about different sets of Resent- header lines
(for when a message is resent several times). The RFC also
specifies that they should be added at the front of the mes‐
sage, and separated by Received: lines. It is not at all
clear how -t should operate in the present of multiple sets,
nor indeed exactly what constitutes a "set". In practice, it
seems that MUAs do not follow the RFC. The Resent- lines are
often added at the end of the header, and if a message is
resent more than once, it is common for the original set of
Resent- headers to be renamed as X-Resent- when a new set is
added. This removes any possible ambiguity.
******************************************************************************Édité par flyonne 19/10/2011 12:00
Merci de prendre connaissance et de respecter les règles des forums.